
Astronauts floating outside the International Space Station. (Andrei Armiagov/Shutterstock)
In a nutshell
• The International Space Station is an extremely sterile environment with limited microbial diversity compared to Earth, which may contribute to astronaut health problems like skin rashes and immune issues.
• Different areas of the space station have unique microbial and chemical signatures based on astronaut activities—with human skin being the primary source of microbes (72.6%) throughout the station.
• Future space habitats could benefit from intentionally incorporating beneficial environmental microbes from Earth to create healthier ecosystems for long-duration missions, rather than maintaining overly sterile conditions.
SAN DIEGO — When astronauts return from space missions with rashes, allergies, and weakened immune systems, the culprit might not be microgravity, but rather an environment that’s too clean. New research from the University of California San Diego shows that the International Space Station (ISS) is essentially a microbial desert compared to Earth’s environments, a finding that challenges our assumptions about what makes a healthy space habitat.
The study, published in Cell, analyzed surface samples from the ISS. Scientists can now tell whether a surface is near the space toilet, dining table, or exercise equipment simply by examining its invisible microbial and chemical residents. Mapping this data provides crucial insights for future long-duration space missions to the Moon and Mars.
The Space Station’s Hidden Ecosystem
Researchers collected 803 surface samples throughout the US Orbital Segment of the ISS during Expedition 64, creating the most extensive map ever of microbes and chemicals in a space habitat. The findings reveal that different modules of the space station have distinct microbial signatures based on how astronauts use those areas.

Unlike Earth-bound homes and buildings, which receive constant microbial inputs from the outside world, the ISS exists in complete isolation, with microbes coming almost exclusively from the astronauts themselves.
This isolation has led to a dramatic reduction in microbial diversity compared to Earth’s environments. The ISS sits at the extreme end of a spectrum that runs from pristine natural settings like rainforests to highly controlled indoor spaces.
Why Astronauts Get Sick in Space
“Future built environments, including space stations, could benefit from intentionally fostering diverse microbial communities that better mimic the natural microbial exposures experienced on Earth, rather than relying on highly sanitized spaces,” says co-first author Rodolfo Salido of the University of California, San Diego, in a statement.
The research team, led by scientists from UC San Diego and NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, found that the ISS environment is dominated by human-associated microbes, particularly those from the skin. While this might sound concerning, most of these microbes aren’t harmful and simply reflect the human presence in space.
However, this lack of environmental microbial diversity may have health implications. On Earth, exposure to diverse environmental microbes helps train our immune systems. The absence of such exposure in space might contribute to the skin rashes, allergies, and immune issues that astronauts commonly experience.
Room by Room Microbial Maps
Each module of the space station tells its own microbial story based on its function. Node 3, which houses the space toilet and exercise equipment, showed microbial signatures associated with human waste. Urine-related microbes were detected on surfaces of the toilet, while fecal microbes were found on nearby surfaces.
Meanwhile, Node 1, which serves as the dining area, contained microbes typically found in food and the human mouth. This pattern makes sense because astronauts eat there, releasing food particles and oral microbes as they talk and eat.
“We noticed that the abundance of disinfectant on the surface of the International Space Station is highly correlated with the microbiome diversity at different locations on the space station,” says co-first author Nina Zhao of UC San Diego.
Chemical Fingerprints in Space
Beyond microbes, the researchers also cataloged nearly 21,000 chemical features on station surfaces. These included everything from food components and human metabolites to industrial chemicals and cleaning products. Particularly interesting was the finding of PFAS, industrial chemicals commonly used as water and stain repellents, concentrated around the station’s treadmill, the only fabric-covered area sampled.

The research team confirmed the presence of disinfectants and cleaning products on many surfaces, despite instructions to avoid cleaning for at least four days before sampling. Interestingly, areas with higher levels of cleaning products also showed higher microbial diversity, possibly because regular cleaning creates open spots for a wider variety of microbes to colonize.
From Earth to Space: The Microbial Spectrum
The ISS shared some microbial similarities with highly industrialized indoor environments like hospitals and isolation dormitories, but had far less in common with homes in rural areas or rainforests.
Compared to most Earth samples, the ISS surfaces were lacking in free-living environmental microbes that are usually found in soil and water. The researchers say intentionally incorporating these microbes and the substrates they live in into the ISS could improve astronaut health without sacrificing hygiene. They compare their suggestion to the well-studied beneficial impacts of gardening on the immune system.
“There’s a big difference between exposure to healthy soil from gardening versus stewing in our own filth, which is kind of what happens if we’re in a strictly enclosed environment with no ongoing input of those healthy sources of microbes from the outside,” says study author Rob Knight.
Building Better Space Habitats

(Copyright: NASA)
Researchers suggest that future space stations might benefit from the deliberate introduction of beneficial environmental microbes to create a more Earth-like microbial ecosystem, potentially improving astronaut health.
They also suggest design considerations like placing high bio/chemical burden areas, such as exercise or hygiene modules, at “terminal” locations to reduce cross-contamination with research areas. This approach could help maintain cleaner conditions in scientific modules while acknowledging the inevitable microbial presence in living spaces.
Monitoring Astronaut Health From a Distance
Simply by sampling surfaces, the researchers could detect signs of human viral reactivation. These viruses remain dormant in the body and can reactivate during stress. This noninvasive approach could provide early warnings about crew health issues without requiring direct medical testing. These methods could also help improve the health of people living and working in similarly sterile environments on Earth.
The ISS microbial mapping project opens a new chapter in our understanding of humans as walking ecosystems. We’ve spent decades trying to eliminate microbes from spacecraft, but this research suggests we should instead be cultivating the right microbial communities to support astronaut health.
Paper Summary
Methodology
Researchers designed dual-headed swabbing devices for astronauts to collect 803 samples across nine ISS modules. After returning to Earth, one swab underwent genetic analysis for microbial identification, while the other was analyzed for chemical compounds. The team created 3D visualizations showing the distribution of microbes and chemicals throughout the station.
Results
Analysis revealed 6,467 distinct bacterial features, with module usage explaining 18.49% of microbial variation. Human skin was the primary source of ISS microbes (72.6% contribution). Node 1 (dining area) showed food-associated microbes, while Node 3 (toilet/exercise area) had waste-associated microbes. Chemical analysis identified nearly 21,000 features, with 79% present across most modules but others being location-specific. The ISS demonstrated dramatically reduced microbial diversity compared to Earth environments.
Limitations
Only 384 of 803 collected samples passed quality filtering due to low biomass from dry swabbing small surface areas. Chemical analysis identified only 3% of detected features. DNA-based methods couldn’t distinguish between living and dead microbes. Sampling excluded crew quarters and was limited to the US Orbital Segment.
Discussion and Takeaways
Human activities strongly drive microbial and chemical profiles in isolated environments, suggesting future habitat designs should incorporate “zoning strategies” to manage microbial transfer. The extreme reduction in environmental microbial diversity may impact astronaut health, indicating probiotic-based approaches might be preferable to chemical disinfection. Surface sampling can provide non-invasive crew health monitoring through metagenomic sequencing.
Funding and Disclosures
Research was supported by the NIH Pioneer Award (DP1AT010885), Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (G-2017-9838), University of California San Diego Medical Scientist Training Program, Center for the Advancement of Science in Space, and International Space Station U.S. National Laboratory. Disclosed conflicts of interest include Rob Knight’s roles with BiomeSense, Inc. and other companies.
Publication Information
The journal paper, “The International Space Station Has a Unique and Extreme Microbial and Chemical Environment Driven by Use Patterns,” was published in Cell (volume 188, pages 1-20) on April 3, 2025. The first authors include Rodolfo A. Salido and Haoqi Nina Zhao. The corresponding authors include Pieter C. Dorrestein and Rob Knight (University of California, San Diego).