A proposed glamping development in Ayrshire, which aimed to introduce 10 pods over three years, has been denied approval by East Ayrshire Council. 

The project, planned for agricultural land at Hillhead Farm near Ochiltree, was submitted by Greenock-based Bonnys Bothies Ltd, with JKM Consultancy acting as the agent. 

The phased development intended to launch five pods in the first year, four in the second, and one more in the third, all featuring hot tubs, with some units accommodating up to six guests.

In a statement supporting the proposal, the agents highlighted the potential benefits for local tourism. 

“The proposed development will provide a high-quality, environmentally compliant self-catering facility that will provide a connection to existing heritage facilities such as Dumfries House and Auchinleck House,” they stated. 

Additionally, they emphasized the project’s alignment with the region’s tourism sector, noting: 

“The proposed development provides short-term self-catering accommodation within a countryside setting which will provide an attractive choice for visitors to East Ayrshire to experience the nearby tourist destinations.”

Despite these assertions, the council determined that the development would pose challenges related to land use and infrastructure. 

According to a report by the Daily Record, officials cited concerns over noise, privacy, light pollution, and overall density, concluding that the project would conflict with neighboring residential properties. 

Road safety also factored into the decision, as the council argued that increased traffic on the single-track access road, which has limited passing places, would create an “unacceptable impact.”

The rejection underscores the importance of addressing local infrastructure constraints and community concerns when proposing new glamping developments. 

As the outdoor hospitality sector continues to expand, operators must navigate regulatory challenges while demonstrating how projects can be integrated into existing landscapes with minimal disruption. 

The outcome of this case highlights the need for industry stakeholders to engage proactively with planning authorities, conduct thorough impact assessments, and explore potential mitigations that could support approval for future developments.