

(Credit: Tverdokhlib/Shutterstock)
Could introducing seafood to kids early on be the key to having more friends?
In a nutshell
- Children who ate the recommended amount of seafood (two servings weekly) showed better prosocial behavior—they were more helpful, sharing, and considerate toward others.
- Not eating any seafood at age 7 increased the risk of poor prosocial behavior by 35% at age 7 and 43% by age 9, compared to children who ate recommended amounts.
- The beneficial nutrients in seafood, including omega-3 fatty acids, iodine, and selenium, may contribute to brain development in ways that specifically support social behavior rather than cognitive abilities like IQ.
BRISTOL, England — When parents deal with picky eaters or work on creating balanced meals for their children, seafood often isn’t top of mind. But recent research suggests those fish sticks or salmon fillets might affect more than just physical health—they could be influencing how children behave toward others.
A study published in the European Journal of Nutrition found that children who eat seafood regularly show better prosocial behavior—meaning they’re more likely to help others, share things, and show consideration. This research gives parents a specific food recommendation that could help their children develop socially.
Researchers at the University of Bristol in England looked at data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), examining nearly 8,300 children at age 7 and more than 6,800 children at age 9. They wanted to see if the amount of fish these children ate affected their thinking skills and behavior.
What they found was eye-opening: Children who ate no seafood at age 7 had a 35% higher risk of poor prosocial behavior at that same age compared to children who ate at least 190 grams of seafood weekly (about two servings). This effect lasted over time—by age 9, children who had eaten no seafood at age 7 were 43% more likely to show poor prosocial behavior compared to those who had eaten the recommended amounts.
Prosocial behavior is what we see when children do things that help others—sharing their toys, helping someone who’s hurt, or comforting a sad friend. These behaviors usually start to appear around a child’s first birthday and grow more complex as they age. They matter for both personal development and for getting along well in groups.


What’s the connection between seafood and child social development?
The findings stand out because seafood consumption in the UK—where the study took place—is much lower than what health officials recommend. The UK’s National Diet and Nutrition Survey shows children aged 4-18 eat less than 20 grams of oily fish weekly, nowhere near the recommended 95 grams. Many Western countries show similar patterns of low seafood consumption.
But why would seafood affect behavior? The answer probably lies in what fish and shellfish contain. They’re rich in nutrients that help brain development, especially docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosahexaenoic acid (EPA)—omega-3 fatty acids that make up brain cell membranes. These fatty acids concentrate in the brain and affect everything from gene expression to how flexible cell membranes are.
Seafood also delivers other brain nutrients like iodine, which helps make thyroid hormones that affect brain development. Selenium, another mineral in seafood, helps make proteins for DNA production and works as an antioxidant. Choline, also found in seafood, helps produce acetylcholine, a brain chemical involved in pain response and thinking processes.
Curiously, this study found that while seafood intake was linked to better prosocial behavior, it didn’t affect IQ scores. This suggests fish nutrients might influence some parts of brain development but not others, or that timing matters for different aspects of development.
The researchers looked specifically at DHA intake and found a weaker but still present connection with prosocial behavior at age 9. This suggests that while DHA matters, the whole package of nutrients in seafood might do more good than any single nutrient alone.


Aim for 2+ servings of fish per week
For parents, the takeaway is straightforward: trying to include at least two servings of seafood weekly might help children develop better social skills. Health authorities already recommend this amount, but knowing about possible behavior benefits might motivate more families to add fish to meals.
This study builds on research connecting childhood nutrition to brain development and behavior. Previous studies have looked at how a mother’s seafood consumption during pregnancy affects her child’s development, but fewer studies have examined children’s own seafood intake.
The research team was careful to account for other factors that might explain the results, such as sex, mother’s education, smoking during pregnancy, family difficulties, ethnicity, and breastfeeding history. Even after adjusting for these variables, the link between seafood and prosocial behavior held up.
It’s worth noting that this study shows a connection rather than proving cause and effect. However, the design—following the same children over time—and consistent results at two different ages make the findings more convincing. The researchers also considered mercury exposure, often mentioned as a concern with seafood, and concluded that at normal consumption levels, the benefits of fish nutrients likely outweigh any risks from contaminants.
Families wanting to add more seafood to children’s diets might start with mild-tasting fish like cod or tilapia. Kid-friendly preparations such as fish tacos, pasta with salmon sauce, or homemade fish sticks can make seafood more appealing. Canned tuna and salmon are budget-friendly options that still offer nutritional benefits.
It makes sense that omega-3 fatty acids, which concentrate in the brain, would affect behavior. What’s interesting is that they specifically seem to influence being helpful and kind to others—suggesting these nutrients might play a role in our capacity for empathy, cooperation, and altruism.
Perhaps the old saying about fish being “brain food” holds more truth than we realized—not just for test scores, but for developing the social smarts that help children navigate relationships. In today’s world, where social skills matter enormously, a simple fish dinner might be doing far more for child development than we’ve given it credit for.
Paper Summary
Methodology
The researchers tracked children in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), a large observational study in Avon, UK. They looked at 5,969 children with complete diet and IQ data, 8,276 with complete diet data and SDQ scores at age 7, and 6,819 with complete diet data and SDQ scores at age 9. They collected food information when children were 7 years old using a questionnaire filled out by parents, asking about how often children ate 80 different foods. They grouped seafood intake into three categories: none (0 g/week), some but below recommendations (1-190 g/week), and meeting recommendations (≥190 g/week). They measured thinking skills through IQ tests at age 8 using the Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children, and behavior through the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) at ages 7 and 9. For analysis, they used statistical methods to see how seafood intake affected the odds of having below-average IQ or SDQ scores, while accounting for factors like child sex, mother’s education, smoking during pregnancy, family problems, and breastfeeding.
Results
The children in the study ate about 123 grams of seafood weekly (median), with 7.2% eating none, 63.9% eating some but not enough (1-190 grams), and 28.9% eating the recommended amount (at least 190 grams). The main finding was about seafood and helping behavior: children who ate no seafood had 35% higher odds of poor prosocial behavior at age 7 and 43% higher odds at age 9 compared to those eating enough seafood. Children eating some but not enough seafood also showed higher odds of poor prosocial scores (25% higher at age 7 and 30% higher at age 9) compared to those eating enough. These links stayed strong even after accounting for many other factors. When looking specifically at DHA (a type of omega-3 fat), they found a weaker link with prosocial behavior at age 9. They found no connections between seafood intake and IQ scores at age 8, or with other behavior measures like hyperactivity, emotional difficulties, conduct problems, or peer problems. This suggests seafood might affect specific social behaviors rather than overall thinking skills or other behavior areas.
Limitations
The researchers pointed out several weaknesses in their study. First, the children didn’t eat much seafood overall—about 123 grams weekly on average, below the recommended 190 grams. This made it harder to see how different levels of seafood consumption might affect development. Second, many families dropped out of the study over time, especially those with social disadvantages, which might limit how widely the findings apply. The study population was mostly white, which also limits how well the results might apply to diverse groups. Like all observational studies, this one couldn’t rule out all other possible explanations—their model explained just part of the variation in IQ results, suggesting other important factors might not have been measured. They used a shortened IQ test rather than the full version, though this shortened test has been validated previously. Finally, while the study showed a connection between seafood and behavior, it couldn’t definitively prove that seafood caused the behavior differences.
Discussion and Key Takeaways
The researchers stressed the importance of their finding that seafood intake affects children’s behavior, particularly how they act toward others. This matters because most children in the study ate less fish than recommended. They note that seafood provides many nutrients children need for development, so not eating enough could affect overall health. They suggest that nutrients in seafood, especially omega-3 fatty acids like DHA, might help specific aspects of brain development related to social behavior. The fact that seafood was linked to prosocial behavior but not to IQ or other behaviors suggests different nutrients might affect different aspects of development. They considered possible downsides of seafood, like mercury exposure, but concluded that at normal consumption levels, the benefits likely outweigh the risks. This study helps fill a gap in research, as most previous studies looked at mothers’ seafood consumption during pregnancy rather than children’s own fish intake.
Funding and Disclosures
The UK Medical Research Council, Wellcome, and the University of Bristol funded the ALSPAC study. Caroline Taylor, one of the lead researchers, received support from an MRC Career Development Award. The researchers declared no conflicts of interest. The ALSPAC Ethics and Law Committee and Local Research Ethics Committees approved the study, and participants gave informed consent.
Publication Information
This study, “Seafood intake in children at age 7 years and neurodevelopmental outcomes in an observational cohort study (ALSPAC),” appeared in the European Journal of Nutrition (2025) volume 64, page 120. L. Nel, P.M. Emmett, J. Golding, and C.M. Taylor from the Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol wrote the paper. It was received December 17, 2024, accepted February 23, 2025, and published online March 11, 2025.