

Even virtual exposure to nature is effective in calming your brain. (Ellyy/Shutterstock)
In a nutshell
- Nature reduces pain at a neural level. Brain scans show that viewing natural scenes lowers activity in regions that process pain signals, making discomfort feel less intense.
- Virtual nature works too. Even simulated nature, like videos or images, provides pain relief, suggesting hospitals and healthcare settings could use this for non-drug pain management.
- The study confirms nature’s impact isn’t just psychological; it directly alters brain activity, reducing pain sensitivity in a way that differs from placebo responses.
VIENNA — Pain relief might grow on trees after all. Scientists have discovered that simply looking at natural scenes can directly reduce pain sensations by calming specific brain circuits. A new international study reveals that nature exposure goes beyond just making us feel better about pain, it actually changes how our brains process painful stimuli at a fundamental level.
“Numerous studies have shown that people consistently report feeling less pain when exposed to nature. Yet until now, the underlying reasons for this effect were unclear,” explains lead study author Max Steininger from the University of Vienna, in a statement. “Our study is the first to provide evidence from brain scans that this isn’t just a ‘placebo’ effect.”
For years, researchers have known about nature’s health benefits, from lowering stress to improving mental health. Previous studies hinted that nature might help with pain: surgery patients needed fewer painkillers when their hospital rooms had views of trees instead of brick walls, and dental patients reported less discomfort when looking at natural scenes. But these earlier studies couldn’t determine if nature was directly responsible for pain reduction or if people just thought they felt better. Now, a new study published in Nature Communications provides compelling evidence that nature exposure alters pain processing in the brain, offering a concrete explanation for its pain-relieving effects.
To get clear answers, the researchers designed a controlled experiment using brain scanning to watch brain activity during painful experiences while people viewed different environments. Forty-nine participants were placed in a brain scanner and shown virtual scenes of three different settings: a natural lake with trees, an urban setting with buildings by the same lake, and an indoor office. While viewing these scenes, participants received brief electric shocks to their hands, some painful and some not, and rated how intense and unpleasant each shock felt.


How Nature Changes Your Brain During Pain
When viewing the nature scenes, participants consistently reported lower pain compared to when they viewed urban or indoor environments. The brain scans confirmed these weren’t just subjective differences; actual pain-related brain activity decreased when participants viewed nature.
“Pain is like a puzzle with different pieces processed in different parts of the brain,” explains Steininger. “Some pieces of the puzzle relate to our emotional response to pain, such as how unpleasant we find it. Other pieces correspond to the physical signals underlying the painful experience, such as its location in the body and its intensity. Unlike placebos, which usually change our emotional response to pain, viewing nature changed how the brain processed early, raw sensory signals of pain.”
The researchers used advanced brain analysis techniques to determine which aspects of pain processing were affected by nature exposure. When participants viewed nature scenes while receiving painful stimuli, their brains showed significantly reduced activity in regions that handle the sensory and physical aspects of pain. Meanwhile, the brain patterns related to the emotional and cognitive processing of pain showed no significant differences between environments.


The researchers carefully designed their natural and urban environments with similar visual characteristics. Both included appealing elements like a large body of water and complex visual features. This careful matching means that the pain-reducing effect wasn’t simply because one environment was prettier than the other.
Interestingly, the indoor and urban environments produced similar pain ratings and brain responses, despite their differences. This suggests that the pain-reducing effect is specifically related to the presence of natural elements rather than something negative about urban environments.
“Our findings suggest that the pain-relieving effect of nature is genuine, although the effect we found was around half that of painkillers,” says Steininger. “People in pain should certainly continue taking prescribed medication. But we hope in future alternative ways of relieving pain, such as experiencing nature, may be used to help improve pain management.”
What’s particularly promising is that even virtual nature, not just actual outdoor environments, can produce these pain-reducing effects. This could be especially valuable in healthcare settings. Hospitals could incorporate nature scenes into treatment rooms, potentially reducing patients’ discomfort during procedures. For people with chronic pain, regular exposure to natural environments, whether real or virtual, might complement traditional pain management approaches.


“This study highlights how virtual encounters can bring the healing potential of nature to people when they can’t get outside,” says co-author Alex Smalley from the University of Exeter. “But we hope our results also serve as renewed evidence for the importance of protecting healthy and functioning natural environments, encouraging people to spend time in nature for the benefit of both the planet and people.”
The ancient wisdom that nature heals now has modern science to back it up. Whether it’s a forest trail, a park bench, or even a nature documentary on your screen, these findings suggest that regular doses of greenery might be a valuable addition to our pain management toolkit. These green prescriptions might be just what the doctor should be ordering.
Paper Summary
Methodology
The study employed a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment with 49 healthy participants who were exposed to three different virtual environments: natural, urban, and indoor settings. Each environment was shown for 5 minutes, followed by a 9-minute session where participants received electrical shocks while continuing to view the environment. The shocks were individually calibrated to represent either “very painful but bearable” or “perceptible but non-painful” sensations. Participants rated the intensity and unpleasantness of the shocks on a scale from zero to eight. The environments were carefully matched for visual characteristics and accompanied by corresponding soundscapes all normalized for volume.
Results
Participants reported significantly lower pain when exposed to virtual nature compared to both urban and indoor environments. Both pain intensity and unpleasantness ratings decreased, with the effect more pronounced for unpleasantness. Brain imaging showed decreased activity in the Neurologic Pain Signature (NPS), which is associated with the sensory aspects of pain, while the Stimulus Intensity Independent Pain Signature-1 (SIIPS1), related to emotional aspects of pain, showed no significant changes. Further analysis confirmed reduced activation in brain areas associated with sensory pain processing, including the thalamus, secondary somatosensory cortex, and posterior insula. The urban and indoor environments produced similar pain responses, suggesting the effect was due to nature’s pain-reducing properties rather than pain-increasing properties of urban environments.
Limitations
The study has several key limitations. First, participants were exposed to virtual simulations rather than real environments, potentially affecting generalizability. Second, the research focused only on acute, experimentally-induced pain in healthy adults, which differs from chronic pain conditions. Third, the specific elements of natural environments most responsible for pain reduction couldn’t be determined. Finally, the long-term efficacy of nature-based interventions for pain management in clinical settings remains untested.
Discussion and Takeaways
The findings demonstrate that nature exposure genuinely reduces pain through changes in how the brain processes sensory pain information, particularly at early stages of pain processing. Unlike placebo effects, which typically affect higher-level cognitive-emotional aspects of pain, nature exposure specifically reduced the sensory components of pain processing. This suggests that nature-based interventions could provide a simple, accessible, and side-effect-free complement to conventional pain management approaches. The fact that virtual nature exposure is effective opens possibilities for implementing these approaches in healthcare settings where patients experience acute pain, without requiring access to real outdoor environments.
Funding and Disclosures
The research was funded by grants from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), including “DK Cognition and Communication 2,” “Lise Meitner Fellowship,” and “Neuronal circuits in health and disease.” Additional support came from the EU’s Horizon Europe research program and the Wellcome Trust. The authors declared no competing interests. The study represented the first collaboration between neuroscience and environmental psychology researchers at the University of Vienna, with key researchers also being members of the university’s Environment and Climate Research Hub.
Publication Information
The study, titled “Nature exposure induces analgesic effects by acting on nociception-related neural processing,” was authored by Maximilian O. Steininger, Mathew P. White, Lukas Lengersdorff, Lei Zhang, Alexander J. Smalley, Simone Kühn, and Claus Lamm. It was published in Nature Communications on March 13, 2025 (Volume 16, Article number 2037).