15:29 GMT - Friday, 21 March, 2025

Which is better for astrophotography? Sony, Canon or Nikon?

Home - Space & Technology - Which is better for astrophotography? Sony, Canon or Nikon?

Share Now:

Posted 17 hours ago by inuno.ai

Category:


It can be a complex decision to choose the right camera brand for astrophotography. With new technology and an ever-increasing rate of camera development, the major photographic brands that we see regularly popping up, like Canon, Nikon, and Sony, each bring district strengths to the table. Telling these strengths apart and knowing what to pay attention to can sometimes be difficult. In astrophotography, key factors like low-light performance, high ISO capabilities, noise reduction, and any included specific astro-centric features are paramount. If you are in the market for a camera, it might be worth checking out these brands in our camera deals hub. In this article, we will discuss how the brands compare and answer common tech queries about each system.

Sony

A close up of a Sony camera.

Sony excels at handling high ISO with minimal noise. (Image credit: Getty Images)

Sony A7R IV

Sony a7r iv camera product shot on white

(Image credit: Sony)

The Sony A7R IV mirrorless camera offers plenty of quality and value for money. Excellent autofocus, eye/face tracking, premium image quality, a massive 61MP resolution, up to 10FPS shooting and a lightweight design are all features. For a closer look, check out our Sony a7R IV review.

Firstly, Sony recently broke ground with its cutting-edge sensor technology. Sony’s mirrorless systems, especially the full-frame options, excel in handling high ISO settings with minimal noise, making them popular for astrophotographers and people taking images in low-light environments. Their backside illuminated sensors (often referred to as BI sensors) allow more light to hit the pixel area, improving sensitivity and reducing noise, which is crucial for capturing faint celestial objects. Sony also has excellent real-time star tracking and pixel shift technology to provide clear, high-detail astro images, but much of this comes at a price, with good full-frame Sony options coming in at thousands of dollars.

Canon

A close up of a Canon camera.

Canon’s exceptional color science makes them a favorite among astrophotographers. (Image credit: Getty Images)

Canon has long been a favorite for astrophotography thanks to its exceptional color science and sensor performance at higher ISO values, although they tend to produce slightly more noise than Sony’s comparable models. Canon’s strength lies in its wide range of compatible lenses and dedicated low-light features in select models such as the Canon EOS R5 and EOS R6. The affordability of many of their models mean that second-hand Canon options can often be purchased for a fraction of the price of many newer options.

Nikon

Nikon has recently stepped up its game with mirrorless Z-series cameras, like the Nikon Z6 and Z7. Nikon’s full-frame cameras boast excellent dynamic range and superb low-light performance, making them competitive for astrophotography. Like Sony, Nikon’s backside illumination sensor technology helps with reducing noise at high ISOs, though Nikon’s high ISO noise reduction isn’t always as aggressive as Sony’s. Nikon also offers specialized features such as ‘star-eater’ suppression, designed to maintain image quality during long exposures which will come in handy for photographers who are pointing towards the night sky.

A close up of a Nikon camera

‘Star eater’ suppression is designed to maintain image quality during long exposures. (Image credit: Getty Images)

Best entry-level cameras for astrophotography

If you are just getting started in astrophotography, you will want to look at setups that allow experimentation — a mixture of affordability and a wide range of lenses is important to look at. The Nikon D5600 is a good starting point — plenty of lens combinations are available and the 24.2 MP sensor has an ISO range of 100-25,600. It is also good at low light autofocus, which, although, as a budding astrophotographer, you’ll rarely use, it is good to have as an option if you are taking photos of a supermoon, for example.

Supermoon rising over Vancouver skyline.

Low light autofocus is a good feature to have when photographing a supermoon. (Image credit: jamesvancouver via Getty Images)

We would also recommend something like the ultra-portable Sony Alpha a6400, which, although still an APS-C sensor, offers options for interchangeable lenses and features real-time tracking, where it uses AI behavior models to detect and capture objects in the distance automatically.

Swipe to scroll horizontally

Best mid-range cameras for astrophotography

The Northern Lights over a mountain range with bright streetlights in the foreground

Long exposure shooting is unavoidable in astrophotography (Image credit: Getty Images)

Nikon Z6 II

Nikon Z6 II

(Image credit: Nikon)

The Nikon Z6 II is a full-frame camera that we think is the best rugged option for astrophotography. Showcasing an ISO range up to 51,200, dual SD and CFexpress slot and excellent weather sealing. This camera won’t let you down when out and capturing the stars in the elements. Read our full Nikon Z6 II review.

Highlighted Articles

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Stay Connected

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.